Do green, low-carbon travel & tourism supply chains unintentionally exclude women?

May 26, 2026

Do green low carbon travel tourism supply chains unintentionally exclude women Gemini Generated Image s50as1s50as1s50a
Do you value diversity of opinion and perspective? Share yours

Do green, low-car­bon travel & tour­ism sup­ply chains unin­ten­tion­ally exclude women?

“[C]lean energy trans­itions are nev­er purely tech­nic­al. They redis­trib­ute costs and oppor­tun­it­ies, which can unin­ten­tion­ally widen exist­ing gender inequities.” 

This is what Kev­in Phun of the Centre for Respons­ible Tour­ism Singa­pore asks and argues in a “Good Tour­ism” Insight Bite that leads a com­pil­a­tion of responses.

How green, low-carbon supply chains unintentionally exclude women

Kevin Phun, Founder & Director, The Centre for Responsible Tourism Singapore

Decar­bon­isa­tion in travel & tour­ism involves meas­ur­ing emis­sions, green pro­cure­ment, and ret­ro­fit­ting. Yet, clean energy trans­itions are nev­er purely tech­nic­al. They redis­trib­ute costs and oppor­tun­it­ies, which can unin­ten­tion­ally widen exist­ing gender inequit­ies. 

Kevin Phun
Kev­in Phun

In devel­op­ing des­tin­a­tions, women are over-rep­res­en­ted in lower-paid roles and pre­cari­ous work. They will likely feel the down­side of decar­bon­isa­tion more acutely.

To reduce emis­sions, hotels and tour oper­at­ors increas­ingly prefer approved sup­pli­ers. While this improves account­ab­il­ity, it cre­ates gate­keep­ing; shut­ting out women-led micro-enter­prises that have to deal with often thin­ner mar­gins, weak­er access to fin­ance, and less time for paperwork.

When trace­ab­il­ity sys­tems and sus­tain­ab­il­ity doc­u­ment­a­tion become pre­requis­ites, the bur­den falls unevenly. A policy that looks ‘neut­ral’ on paper can exclude women-run cater­ing, small-scale pro­du­cers, and inform­al pro­viders from travel & tour­ism value chains. The more estab­lished and bet­ter-resourced firms win the contracts.

For example, female street vendors in Cairo are com­monly treated as illeg­al and seen as block­ing invest­ment and tour­ism devel­op­ment. Busi­ness prac­tices requir­ing per­mits dis­pro­por­tion­ately remove women’s inform­al, low-mar­gin income sources.

This exclu­sion is rein­forced by a cre­den­tial eco­nomy around sus­tain­ab­il­ity cer­ti­fic­a­tion. When a logo becomes a short­cut for trust, pro­cure­ment teams screen sup­pli­ers by cer­ti­fic­a­tion status rather than attain­able improve­ment. Women entre­pren­eurs can be locked out, even when their prac­tices are loc­ally appro­pri­ate and low-carbon.

Travel & tour­ism is dom­in­ated by often women-led small and medi­um-sized enter­prises (SMEs) that struggle to fin­ance upgrades and nav­ig­ate com­plex guid­ance. Because women entre­pren­eurs already face tight­er cred­it con­straints, trans­ition require­ments trans­late into high­er rel­at­ive costs. Decar­bon­isa­tion bur­eau­cracy and cre­den­tial­ism means women-led SMEs face high­er bar­ri­ers to entry than lar­ger or more estab­lished operators.

A just decar­bon­isa­tion path­way must pair car­bon goals with gender inclu­sion: sim­pli­fy­ing doc­u­ment­a­tion, provid­ing tar­geted fin­ance, and reward­ing improve­ment over credentials.

Back to menu ^

It depends. Wrong question.

Wolfgang Georg Arlt, Executive Director, Meaningful Tourism Centre, Nepal

The first-level answer is, unsur­pris­ingly: it depends.

Prof Dr Wolfgang Georg Arlt FRGS FRAS, CEO, Meaningful Tourism Center, Germany
Read more by Prof Dr Wolfgang Georg Arlt

If you use a hol­ist­ic approach like ‘mean­ing­ful tour­ism’, which is based on the insight that travel & tour­ism is only sus­tain­able if it provides object­ive bene­fits and sub­ject­ive sat­is­fac­tion to all stake­hold­ers, it becomes clear that sup­ply chains that unin­ten­tion­ally or oth­er­wise exclude women are not ‘green’.

It also becomes clear that a ‘low-car­bon’ approach as a stan­dalone strategy is the wrong approach.

The world, includ­ing travel & tour­ism, is facing many chal­lenges on an unpre­ced­en­ted scale. These include cli­mate change, game-chan­ging tech­no­lo­gic­al devel­op­ments, grow­ing geo­pol­it­ic­al ten­sions, and older, more mature trav­el­lers with chan­ging demands for trans­form­a­tion­al forms of consumption.

These chal­lenges are inter­con­nec­ted. Attempts to react to one of them while ignor­ing the oth­ers have failed, and will con­tin­ue to fail.

Elec­tric vehicles reduce pol­lu­tion, but do not stop cit­ies from being built around cars rather than people. Sim­il­arly, ‘low-car­bon’ tech­no­logy slows down cli­mate change a bit, but does not help with the inclu­sion of women or the fight against poverty.

So the deep­er-level answer to the ques­tion is: wrong question.

Back to menu ^

Can travel & tourism ever be sustainable if inequality grows?

Pham Phi Anh, Deputy Head of Project Development — Fundraising Unit, Anh Duong Center, Vietnam

In the Mekong Delta, travel & tour­ism is often presen­ted as a solu­tion: more vis­it­ors, more jobs, more income, and more devel­op­ment. And some­times, that is true.

Phạm Phi Anh
Phạm Phi Anh

A fam­ily opens a homestay. A young per­son becomes a loc­al guide instead of migrat­ing to the city. A vil­lage keeps tra­di­tion­al food, music, or crafts alive because vis­it­ors value them. 

Travel & tour­ism can cre­ate pride and opportunity.

But I have also seen anoth­er reality.

In many places, travel & tour­ism money does not stay where the exper­i­ence hap­pens. River­side land becomes more valu­able, but loc­al fam­il­ies can­not afford to improve their homes. Out­side investors build com­fort­able eco-lodges while nearby com­munit­ies still struggle with flood­ing, unstable incomes, poor waste sys­tems, and cli­mate pressure.

The people smil­ing in travel & tour­ism bro­chures are often the same people car­ry­ing the heav­iest risks when vis­it­or num­bers drop. That is the con­tra­dic­tion. Travel & tour­ism can look envir­on­ment­ally ‘green’ while inequal­ity quietly grows under­neath it.

In the Mekong Delta, cli­mate change already pushes many rur­al fam­il­ies into fra­gile live­li­hoods. If travel & tour­ism devel­op­ment increases depend­ence without increas­ing loc­al own­er­ship or decision-mak­ing power, then sus­tain­ab­il­ity becomes very shal­low. A sol­ar pan­el on a resort roof does not auto­mat­ic­ally make the sur­round­ing sys­tem fair.

For me, travel & tour­ism becomes sus­tain­able only when com­munit­ies gain more than tem­por­ary income. They need a voice, bar­gain­ing power, land secur­ity, skills, and real par­ti­cip­a­tion in shap­ing travel & tour­ism itself. Oth­er­wise, sus­tain­ab­il­ity risks becom­ing a beau­ti­ful mar­ket­ing word float­ing above very unequal ground.

Back to menu ^

Calling it ‘unintentional’ gives policymakers a free pass

Doreen Nyamweya, Tourism Officer, Nyamira County, Kenya

Wheth­er the exclu­sion of women from ‘green’ sup­ply chains is inten­tion­al or unin­ten­tion­al is a mat­ter of struc­tur­al design versus mali­cious intent.

Doreen Nyamweya
Doreen Nyam­weya

In many cases, I find it unin­ten­tion­al yet pro­foundly sys­tem­ic. It is not a case of someone say­ing women can­not par­ti­cip­ate, but a case of ignored barriers.

Women make up nearly 40% of the glob­al travel & tour­ism work­force, but they are often sub­jec­ted to struc­tur­al exclu­sion. This usu­ally hap­pens because policies are gender-blind. They are cre­ated uni­ver­sally, without account­ing for the dis­par­it­ies in the social and eco­nom­ic pos­i­tions of men and women. 

‘Green’ travel & tour­ism sup­ply chains often mar­gin­al­ise women by requir­ing form­al cer­ti­fic­a­tions that favour their asset-rich male counterparts. 

Fur­ther­more, an Inter­na­tion­al Mon­et­ary Fund (IMF) pub­lic­a­tion high­lights that the huge gender gap and under-rep­res­ent­a­tion of women in STEM (sci­ence, tech­no­logy, engin­eer­ing, and math­em­at­ics) edu­ca­tion excludes them from green jobs in renew­able energy and sus­tain­ab­il­ity man­age­ment that guar­an­tee faster growth. 

Com­pound­ing this with the bur­den of unpaid domest­ic labour, women lack the time to gain the neces­sary expert­ise, lead­ing to their exclu­sion from the emer­ging low-car­bon eco­nomy and its sup­ply chains. 

If we decar­bon­ise the industry but unin­ten­tion­ally leave women behind in the inform­al sec­tor, we haven’t cre­ated sus­tain­able travel & tour­ism devel­op­ment. Instead, we per­petu­ate the same inequal­ity we claim to have erad­ic­ated. By ignor­ing gender par­ity dur­ing the design phase, poli­cy­makers embed inequal­ity dir­ectly into ‘green’ infrastructure. 

There­fore, once we call it ‘unin­ten­tion­al’, we risk giv­ing poli­cy­makers a free pass. The minute we call it ‘sys­tem­ic’, we acknow­ledge that the sys­tem is work­ing exactly as it was designed: to favour those who already have the most resources to adapt.

When I look at how gender-blind policies affect already mar­gin­al­ised groups, I find that ‘unin­ten­tion­al’ over­sights are just as dam­aging as delib­er­ate, expli­cit exclusions.

Back to menu ^

What do you think? 

Share your own thoughts in a com­ment below. 

SIGN IN or REGISTER first. (After sign­ing in you will need to refresh this page to see the com­ments section.) 

Or write a “GT” Insight or “GT” Insight Bite of your own. The “Good Tour­ism” Blog wel­comes diversity of opin­ion and per­spect­ive about travel & tour­ism, because travel & tour­ism is everyone’s business.

This is an open invit­a­tion to travel & tour­ism stake­hold­ers from any back­ground to share their thoughts in plain Eng­lish with a glob­al industry audience.

“GT” doesn’t judge. “GT” pub­lishes. “GT” is where free thought travels.

If you think the tour­ism media land­scape is bet­ter with “GT” in it, then please … 

Back to menu ^

Previous “GT” Insight Bites

Featured image (top of post)

A Gem­ini-gen­er­ated image. Do green, low-car­bon travel & tour­ism sup­ply chains unin­ten­tion­ally exclude women?

Top ^

Related posts

Posted in Insight Bites, Insights & Best Practices
Tags: , , ,
Follow comments on this post
Please notify me of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.