Tourism’s biggest threats, opportunities: five years to 2030

December 1, 2025

Tourism’s biggest threats, opportunities: five years to 2030. A Gemini-generated image. "GT" added the words.
Do you value diversity of opinion and perspective? Share yours

What is tourism’s biggest oppor­tun­ity and/or threat, either in your spe­cif­ic loc­a­tion or glob­ally, over the next five years (2026 – 2030)?

Thanks to the 17 good people who respon­ded to this “Good Tour­ism” Insight Bites ques­tion, includ­ing aca­dem­ics, edu­cat­ors, and activists.

Spe­cial thanks to those who work in busi­ness and cor­por­ate roles for tak­ing the time to share their thoughts. Like the industry it serves, The “Good Tour­ism” Blog is all about bridging worlds. 

Find below, for your con­sid­er­a­tion and enjoy­ment, place-based per­spect­ives from Eng­land to Iran, Bar­celona to Bend; mul­tiple glob­al issues from cost-cut­ting arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence to out-of-whack aca­demia; women’s empower­ment to ocean plastic. The responses appear in the order I received them.

Have a thought to share? 

Respond in the com­ments at any time. Or write a Bite of your own. 

Bites menu


Pilgrimage, culture, relaxation … and surgery … in Iran

Zohreh Khosravi, Content Manager, flysepehran.com, Iran

Since I work for an Ira­ni­an air­line and our office is loc­ated at Mash­had Inter­na­tion­al Air­port (MHD), I see many pas­sen­gers every day who are either return­ing home after vis­it­ing Mash­had and oth­er cit­ies in Iran or depart­ing for pil­grim­age trips to Iraq.

I have no inten­tion of cri­ti­cising or endors­ing pil­grim­ages at this time, but the fact that there are daily flights to these des­tin­a­tions, and even mul­tiple flights in a single day, indic­ates that reli­gious travel is highly desired by the people of Iran and its neigh­bours, includ­ing Iraq, Kuwait, Bahrain, and Saudi Arabia.

These jour­neys are fre­quently organ­ised as tours that include accom­mod­a­tion, round-trip tick­ets, pil­grim­age tour ser­vices, attrac­tion vis­its, and souven­ir pur­chases, mak­ing the trip easy and enjoy­able for the travellers.

Inter­na­tion­al vis­it­ors to Iran fol­low a sim­il­ar pat­tern, which involves a com­bin­a­tion of 

  • Pil­grim­age to Mash­had in north-east­ern Iran;
  • Cul­tur­al excur­sions to Shiraz, Isfa­han, and Yazd; and
  • Relax­a­tion by the Caspi­an Sea and in the UNESCO World Her­it­age Hyrcani­an forests

These will remain the main focus for organ­ised tours to and with­in Iran, espe­cially among middle-aged and older groups who will con­tin­ue to make up the major­ity of travellers.

Med­ic­al tour­ism in Iran, includ­ing for cos­met­ic sur­gery, is espe­cially pop­u­lar among Middle East­ern women and rep­res­ents anoth­er opportunity.

Back to menu ^

Is Bend and Central Oregon caught in an ‘amenity trap’?

Ed Jackiewicz, Professor, California State University, Northridge, USA

Not too long ago, I relo­cated to Bend, Ore­gon, wit­ness­ing the rap­id trans­form­a­tion of this small city. I often con­sider what the near future might hold. Here I share my thoughts through the lens of the ‘amen­ity trap’ concept, which describes how places blessed with nat­ur­al amen­it­ies can become vic­tims of their own attract­ive­ness.

Cent­ral Oregon’s rich out­doors and year-round appeal con­tin­ue to draw tour­ists, long-term vis­it­ors, and second-home buyers. 

This tour­ism-driv­en growth has obvi­ous eco­nom­ic bene­fits, and loc­al organ­isa­tions are act­ively try­ing to har­ness eco­nom­ic resources such as lodging-tax rev­en­ues and vis­it­or fees to man­age the social, eco­nom­ic, and envir­on­ment­al pressures. 

The city and region also cre­at­ively brand them­selves as a respons­ible, nature-aware, year-round des­tin­a­tion attract­ing con­scien­tious trav­el­lers. How­ever, as vis­it­or num­bers and inward migra­tion con­tin­ue to grow, Cent­ral Ore­gon risks slid­ing deep­er into the amen­ity trap. 

  • Hous­ing afford­ab­il­ity is already chal­lenged and could worsen, dis­pla­cing loc­al work­ers and long­time res­id­ents as tour­ism and second-home demand inflate real-estate prices. 
  • Infra­struc­ture — roads, water, sew­er, pub­lic health, emer­gency ser­vices — is stressed by vis­it­or surges and rap­id pop­u­la­tion inflow, often fun­ded dis­pro­por­tion­ately by loc­als while vis­it­ors gen­er­ate much of the wear and cost. 
  • Cli­mate change risks — wild­fire, drought, flood — are sig­ni­fic­ant; a major nat­ur­al dis­aster could affect the tour­ism eco­nomy and strain the loc­al fisc­al base.

For tour­ism in this region to be sus­tain­able over the next five years and bey­ond, stake­hold­ers must recog­nise the amen­ity trap warn­ing: nat­ur­al beauty and life­style appeal are strong assets, but they invite growth that can under­mine com­munity char­ac­ter, afford­ab­il­ity, and infrastructure. 

My sense is the region is doing its best to lever­age its amen­it­ies and oppor­tun­it­ies while avoid­ing the trap of being ‘loved to death’, but time will tell.

Back to menu ^

Barcelona: No room? Or no rooms?

Saverio Francesco Bertolucci, Business Development Specialist, VDB Luxury Properties, Spain

The biggest threats to Bar­celona are rep­res­en­ted by poten­tial polit­ic­al tur­moil and laws that favour hotel lobby groups.

Des­pite the ongo­ing multi-bil­lion-dol­lar expan­sion plans at its inter­na­tion­al air­port, Bar­celon­a’s poli­cy­makers have decided to restrict room capa­city instead of expand­ing it.

Only a few hol­i­day rent­al build­ings and a bunch of private own­ers who hold the last licences for hol­i­day apart­ments still stand against the huge hotel lobby com­prised of the biggest cor­por­a­tions, which are the only ones to bene­fit from the latest laws approved by the Gen­er­al­it­at (the Coun­cil of the Municipality).

In a pre­vi­ous “Good Tour­ism” Insight, I described how these dis­crim­in­at­ory laws are caus­ing nev­er-end­ing prob­lems. I can con­firm that Bar­celona con­tin­ues to have the worst hous­ing res­ults in Spain.

In this very alarm­ing and unstable situ­ation, pub­lic hous­ing invest­ments should be the basis of future devel­op­ment plans, fol­low­ing the example of Vienna. How­ever, an increase in pub­lic hous­ing implies even more highly reg­u­lated hous­ing prices. 

There­fore, to mit­ig­ate a crisis that is on the verge of explod­ing, poli­cy­makers should bal­ance estates and invest­ments accord­ing to the dif­fer­ent social classes that are present in town, and offer a more dif­fer­en­ti­ated product able to accom­mod­ate all, i.e. 30% pub­lic hous­ing and 70% private prop­er­ties, plus hotels, ser­viced apart­ment build­ings, co-liv­ings (res­id­en­tial com­munity mod­els), and the few hol­i­day rent­al apart­ments that remain.

Back to menu ^

The intention economy: A ‘lucrative yet troubling new marketplace’?

Greg Richards (Tilburg University) & Wendy Morrill (WYSE Travel Confederation), The Netherlands

In the past, research­ers focused on con­sumer desires and motiv­a­tions as the drivers of tour­ism demand. With the growth of AI, and machines able to pre­dict our wants, some see the emer­gence of the ‘inten­tion economy’. 

This is, accord­ing to Chaud­hary & Penn (2024), a “luc­rat­ive yet troub­ling new mar­ket­place” in which we could see “AI assist­ants that fore­cast and influ­ence our decision-mak­ing at an early stage and sell these devel­op­ing ‘inten­tions’ in real-time to com­pan­ies that can meet the need – even before we have made up our minds.”

In oth­er words, AI will know what we want before we do. Our motiv­a­tions will be increas­ingly influ­enced by algorithms, open to manip­u­la­tion by com­pan­ies who will be able to shape our travel inten­tions to fit their com­mer­cial interests.

The travel industry has always been able to shape travel pat­terns with desir­able images, cre­at­ive storytelling, and attract­ive prices, but AI takes influ­ence to a new level.

Wendy Morrill
Wendy Mor­rill

Will people find ways to escape the inten­tion eco­nomy trap? Could it be used for more bene­vol­ent purposes? 

If the inten­tion eco­nomy could be har­nessed to influ­ence inten­tions towards sus­tain­able travel, per­haps there is hope.

Anoth­er pos­it­ive trend, how­ever, is that people are becom­ing weary of online con­tent in general. 

A return to phys­ic­al travel agen­cies was evid­ent from research on travel book­ings made by young con­sumers, reveal­ing an upward trend since 2017. This fol­lows a sharp decline between 2002 and 2012 which tracks with the rise of OTAs and social media. 

The return to travel agen­cies has been echoed by ABN AMRO research from the Neth­er­lands. The per­cent­age of trav­el­lers aged 18 – 34 book­ing at a phys­ic­al travel agency rose from 4% to 11% between April 2024 and July 2025. And some 38% of US Mil­len­ni­als and Gen Z booked via a travel agent in 2023.

Back to menu ^

Skills shortages threaten hospitality sector

John Morris Williams, Group General Manager, Sanakeo Boutique Hotel & Flora by Sanakeo, Laos

Look­ing ahead to 2030, my view is that the biggest threat is a short­age of skilled or semi-skilled hos­pit­al­ity personnel. 

With more and more hotels and estab­lish­ments being built and not enough hos­pit­al­ity schools, the industry is not doing its share to pro­mote the hard but good life it can bring to those who embrace it.

Four- and five-star hotels and resorts will slide down in their ser­vice deliv­ery and human cap­it­al, unless a world­wide reviv­al is created.

Back to menu ^

‘Why not put our faith in the next generations to do a better job?’

Geoffrey Lipman, Creative Disruption Architect, The SUNx Program, Malta

All the data shows we are fail­ing on the tar­gets laid out in the Par­is Agree­ment, the Sus­tain­able Devel­op­ment Goals (SDGs), and the Biod­iversity Con­ven­tion, so why not put our faith in the next gen­er­a­tions to do a bet­ter job? Our kids and grandkids will be the decision makers when the Par­is tar­get dates are here.

Through Dodo4Kids we want them to start their jour­ney toward Cli­mate Friendly Travel and a thriv­ing plan­et now, so that the dodo becomes a beacon of hope not just a sad reflec­tion on the past. 

Dodo is a quirky char­ac­ter re-incarn­ated from DNA in Malta. Dodo travels around the world meet­ing loc­al chil­dren and enjoy­ing the pleas­ures of being a tour­ist, all the while explor­ing how to be clean and green through online books, car­toons, and games.

Dodo4Kids e‑books for Malta, Maur­i­ti­us, Uganda, Bali, and Ukraine are avail­able now avail­able on Amazon.

SUNx Malta is a val­ued “Good Tour­ism” Partner.

Back to menu ^

‘An imbalance in tourism studies’ = An opportunity to collaborate

S Fatemeh Mostafavi Shirazi, visiting scholar, Iran

Des­pite the rap­id expan­sion of over­tour­ism research, a strik­ing asym­metry per­sists: schol­ars over­whelm­ingly exam­ine res­id­ents’ per­cep­tions, while far few­er invest­ig­ate tour­ists’ aware­ness of how loc­als feel. This is an imbal­ance in tour­ism studies.

Research has long framed over­tour­ism as a phe­nomen­on in which res­id­ents bear the heav­iest social, cul­tur­al, and envir­on­ment­al bur­dens. Con­sequently, their exper­i­ences are high­lighted and treated as the most legit­im­ate and urgent.

While this focus is jus­ti­fied and valu­able, it also unin­ten­tion­ally dis­reg­ards the per­cep­tions of tour­ists, who play a cent­ral role in cre­at­ing the very pres­sures res­id­ents experience.

Empir­ic­al chal­lenges fur­ther con­trib­ute to this gap. Tour­ists are tran­si­ent, time-lim­ited par­ti­cipants in the des­tin­a­tion, and typ­ic­ally res­ist­ant to reflect­ive ques­tion­ing dur­ing leis­ure travel.

Moreover, many vis­it­ors approach des­tin­a­tions through a con­sumer-ori­ented lens, per­ceiv­ing them as spaces designed for pleas­ure rather than as lived envir­on­ments with social ten­sions. This lens reduces their sens­it­iv­ity to loc­al dis­tress unless host dis­sat­is­fac­tion becomes overtly vis­ible. As a res­ult, tour­ists often report high sat­is­fac­tion and low aware­ness of social con­flict, even in des­tin­a­tions where loc­al frus­tra­tion is well documented.

There is also an insti­tu­tion­al dimen­sion: des­tin­a­tion man­age­ment organ­isa­tions and loc­al author­it­ies fre­quently pri­or­it­ise vis­it­or exper­i­ence as an eco­nom­ic imper­at­ive, cre­at­ing nar­rat­ives that down­play res­id­ent dis­con­tent. This rein­forces a research envir­on­ment in which tour­ists’ mis­un­der­stand­ings, blind spots, or detach­ment remain insuf­fi­ciently examined.

Yet under­stand­ing how tour­ists per­ceive — or fail to per­ceive — loc­al feel­ings is cru­cial for sus­tain­able des­tin­a­tion gov­ernance. Align­ing tour­ist aware­ness with res­id­ent real­it­ies can dir­ectly influ­ence vis­it­or beha­vi­or, sup­port com­munity well-being, and inform more bal­anced policy interventions.

I am very inter­ested in sur­vey­ing this top­ic and would wel­come col­lab­or­a­tion with any aca­dem­ic who shares this research interest.

Back to menu ^

Can AI offset tourism’s rising costs?

David Jarratt, Senior Lecturer in Tourism Management, University of Lancashire, UK

Over the next five years, the most imme­di­ate threat to tour­ism glob­ally is rising costs. In many places, infla­tion has pushed up prices across accom­mod­a­tion, food, trans­port and energy; this affects busi­nesses and trav­el­lers, not to men­tion loc­al residents.

A 2024 report by CaixaBank Research shows that tour­ism ser­vice prices in Spain in 2023 were 17.5 per cent high­er than in 2019, with the price of accom­mod­a­tion up by 26.2 per cent over the same period.

This pat­tern reflects a wider squeeze on oper­at­ing costs and house­hold budgets. When travel becomes more expens­ive to provide and to pur­chase, demand becomes fra­gile and mar­gins tighten.

Cli­mate dis­rup­tion adds fur­ther pres­sure through high­er insur­ance costs and great­er uncer­tainty about sea­son­al pat­terns. Con­sequently, afford­ab­il­ity is one of the most sig­ni­fic­ant con­straints facing the sec­tor as a whole.

A sig­ni­fic­ant oppor­tun­ity over the same peri­od, how­ever, is the pro­duct­ive use of arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence (AI).

A 2025 European Travel Com­mis­sion report notes that early stud­ies of gen­er­at­ive AI in ‘know­ledge work’ show pro­ductiv­ity gains of over 60 per cent for writ­ing tasks and over 50 per cent for cod­ing, often along­side qual­ity improve­ments. For a sec­tor shaped by tight staff­ing levels and vari­able demand, tools that improve work­flow, sup­port staff and sim­pli­fy plan­ning can offer real value.

Over a longer time frame, we are also likely to see more auto­ma­tion and robot­ics in vis­ible roles, such as lug­gage hand­lers or waiters, espe­cially where labour mar­kets are tight. AI can also sup­port per­son­al­isa­tion, strengthen pre-vis­it com­mu­nic­a­tion and help des­tin­a­tions man­age vis­it­or flows more effectively.

Costs cre­ate risk, while AI and auto­ma­tion offer a route to effi­ciency and bet­ter use of lim­ited resources.

Back to menu ^

Indonesia’s 620,000-tonne plastic threat

Anna Clerici, Co-founder, No-Trash Triangle Initiative, Indonesia

These num­bers are no longer warn­ings; they’re a call to action:

In North Sulawesi, in the heart of the Cor­al Tri­angle, these fig­ures aren’t abstract. Much of the plastic that ends up in the ocean flows through and to waters tour­ists call “para­dise”.

The loc­al eco­nomy is at risk. Region­al plan­ning shows tour­ism will need 15,000 skilled work­ers soon. Live­li­hoods depend on healthy reefs.

If degrad­a­tion con­tin­ues, icon­ic des­tin­a­tions like Bunaken may no longer offer the exper­i­ence that brings vis­it­ors back. Resorts and dive centres have a front-row seat. They can help make the sys­tem work now, while the big­ger machine slowly catches up.

Let’s be hon­est: we’re still wait­ing for gov­ern­ments to fully step in, enforce bans, and treat waste man­age­ment as a pri­or­ity. We’re still wait­ing for pro­du­cers to finally feel responsible.

But tour­ism doesn’t have to wait. Tour­ism can co-fund loc­al waste sys­tems. It can cre­ate a mod­el where prop­er col­lec­tion — mean­ing fair salar­ies, safety, and dig­nity — is pos­sible even in remote islands where costs are high­er than in cit­ies. Because prop­er waste man­age­ment is expens­ive, and good inten­tions don’t cov­er payroll.

The No-Trash Tri­angle Ini­ti­at­ive proves loc­al stake­hold­ers can sup­port recov­ery. Best of all? It works. Rivers get clean­er, com­munit­ies get stronger, and reefs get a fight­ing chance.

Tour­ism can’t fix everything. But it can bridge the gap between what should hap­pen in five years and what must hap­pen now.

Back to menu ^

How much is too much? Managing opportunity and threat in rural tourism

Shamiso Nyajeka, Dean of the School of Hospitality, PSE-Pour un Sourire d’enfant, Cambodia

The line between oppor­tun­ity and threat can be quite blurry. Some­times they look almost the same, and it’s hard to tell good news from some­thing to worry about. My exper­i­ences liv­ing in rur­al Cam­bod­ia and Zim­b­ab­we — in the serene areas of Kiri­r­om and Nyanga — have made this clear.

In recent years, interest in rur­al spaces has grown. Tour­ists, author­it­ies, investors, and an afflu­ent elite are look­ing to build or buy. Put that togeth­er, and you get a mix that car­ries real oppor­tun­it­ies … and real risks.

There are real oppor­tun­it­ies. Rur­al com­munit­ies can bene­fit mean­ing­fully. In Nyanga, Zim­b­ab­we, where cli­mate change affects farm­ing, tour­ism sup­ports incomes. In Kiri­r­om, Cam­bod­ia, new resorts bring bet­ter roads, jobs, and services.

But the threats are equally real. Growth can slowly chip away at the essence that makes these places spe­cial. It starts with a lodge here, a few homes there, a road pushed slightly fur­ther into green space. Small steps seem harm­less, but they change the land­scape over time.

Every­one is try­ing to do some­thing pos­it­ive; improve live­li­hoods, sup­port com­munit­ies, and make sound invest­ments. But we need clear lim­its, thought­ful plan­ning, and hon­est con­ver­sa­tions about “how much is too much”.

For me, the biggest oppor­tun­ity and the biggest threat lie in the same place: how we choose to man­age growth.

If we get it right, com­munit­ies thrive and nature remains pro­tec­ted. If we get it wrong, we risk lov­ing these des­tin­a­tions to death.

Back to menu ^

England’s local pubs: Use them or lose them

Ashika Kalubadanage, Course Director, Canterbury Christ Church University, England

Glob­ally, tour­ism is increas­ingly mov­ing toward authen­t­ic, sus­tain­able, and exper­i­ence-driv­en travel. Mod­ern tour­ists seek cul­tur­al immer­sion, eco-friendly accom­mod­a­tion, and unique loc­al exper­i­ences, such as culin­ary tour­ism, craft work­shops, or tra­di­tion­al arts.

This shift presents a major oppor­tun­ity for the UK tour­ism industry over the next five years to lever­age its rich cul­tur­al heritage.

A par­tic­u­larly dis­tinct­ive ele­ment of Brit­ish cul­ture is the tra­di­tion­al pub­lic house (pub), which has long served as a com­munity hub. 

How­ever, the pub industry is at a crit­ic­al point. Eco­nom­ic pres­sures, life­style changes, and urb­an­isa­tion have led to the clos­ure of many pubs across England. 

In my small town, four pubs have already closed, high­light­ing the risk to this icon­ic insti­tu­tion. Hav­ing worked in this industry, I under­stand the deep cul­tur­al and social value pubs provide.

The solu­tion lies in link­ing pub cul­ture with sus­tain­able, exper­i­en­tial tourism.

By pro­mot­ing pubs as authen­t­ic des­tin­a­tions, Eng­land can attract high-value vis­it­ors while pre­serving loc­al her­it­age. It allows tour­ists to engage with com­munit­ies, exper­i­ence tra­di­tion­al food and drink, and par­ti­cip­ate in loc­al storytelling.

This approach not only enriches the vis­it­or exper­i­ence but also sup­ports vil­lage pubs, sus­tain­ing loc­al eco­nom­ies and social cohesion.

In this con­text, tourism’s biggest oppor­tun­ity is clearly the pro­mo­tion of authen­t­ic, place-based exper­i­ences. Sus­tain­able ini­ti­at­ives focused on pubs can help the UK sec­tor adapt to evolving trav­el­ler expectations.

Con­versely, fail­ing to seize this oppor­tun­ity could exacer­bate the threat of cul­tur­al loss and eco­nom­ic decline in rur­al areas.

Back to menu ^

Higher education in the UK: Neglect, erosion, and academic snobbery

Sudipta K Sarkar, Senior Lecturer in Tourism Management, Anglia Ruskin University, England

As an edu­cat­or in tour­ism, hos­pit­al­ity, and events (THE) high­er edu­ca­tion for over two dec­ades, I believe the sec­tor in the UK is facing a slow decline.

Busi­ness schools, where many THE courses are now parked, are play­ing a major role in this erosion. Yes, busi­ness schools are killing the THE dis­cip­line in the UK, and the reas­ons are manifold.

Sev­er­al ded­ic­ated THE schools have now been closed or merged without val­id jus­ti­fic­a­tion. Essen­tial train­ing facil­it­ies — espe­cially hos­pit­al­ity labs that once shaped impact­ful learn­ing — have disappeared.

Worse still, in some cases, THE mod­ules are now taught by staff with neither form­al qual­i­fic­a­tions nor mean­ing­ful industry experience.

Busi­ness schools also show little interest in devel­op­ing innov­a­tion labs in areas like tour­ism data ana­lyt­ics, exper­i­ence design, hos­pit­al­ity tech­no­logy, or rev­en­ue man­age­ment, which are cru­cial for pro­du­cing skilled THE know­ledge workers.

Cul­tur­al atti­tudes com­pound these struc­tur­al issues.

In Anglo­phone con­texts, the con­cep­tu­al­isa­tion of hos­pit­al­ity is not as developed as in France or Switzer­land. This is reflec­ted in the tend­ency to treat THE as a mere sub­set of mar­ket­ing rather than a dis­cip­line in its own right.

Yet many US uni­ver­sit­ies, includ­ing elite insti­tu­tions, have developed strong THE fac­ulties. In con­trast, the UK has largely con­fined THE to post-1992 uni­ver­sit­ies, reveal­ing per­sist­ent aca­dem­ic snobbery.

Per­haps most troub­ling is the lack of push­back from THE aca­dem­ics with­in UK insti­tu­tions. Many seem to have hap­pily accep­ted the dom­in­ance of Busi­ness schools without mean­ing­ful resistance.

Regret­tably, a turn­around seems unlikely in the next five years.

The industry is grow­ing annu­ally by 6% and is pro­jec­ted to add GBP 4.4 bil­lion (~USD 5.8 bil­lion) a year to the Brit­ish eco­nomy by 2030. Giv­en these fig­ures, busi­ness schools’ step­moth­erly treat­ment of the sec­tor deserves call­ing out.

Back to menu ^

Opportunities for women’s empowerment in rural Vietnam

Pham Phi Anh, Deputy Head of Project Development — Fundraising Unit, Anh Duong Center, Vietnam

Tour­ism can do more than cre­ate memor­ies; it can shift power.

In rur­al Viet­nam, com­munity-led tour­ism is help­ing women move from being seen as “bene­fi­ciar­ies” to being respec­ted as the essen­tial con­trib­ut­ors that they are.

Across the Mekong Delta, women hold com­munit­ies togeth­er through farm­ing, han­di­crafts, cook­ing, and pre­serving culture. 

Yet these roles often go unnoticed, espe­cially when tour­ism arrives with a char­ity mind­set. When vis­it­ors come to “help the poor”, women’s skills remain invisible.

When tour­ism is built on dig­nity and respect, everything changes.

In our com­munity-based pro­grammes, women lead nat­ur­ally as hosts, artis­ans, and cul­tur­al inter­pret­ers. Vis­it­ors who join a quilt­ing group or a live­li­hood tour are not giv­ing char­ity, they are pay­ing for skill, tal­ent, and authen­t­ic cul­tur­al value.

Start­ing in 2026, each vis­it­or we host will con­trib­ute USD 65 per per­son per day dir­ectly to women-led live­li­hood pro­jects. This cre­ates stable incomes that sup­port school­ing, house­hold decision-mak­ing, and long-term resilience.

Tour­ism can­not solve every chal­lenge. But when women can man­age their own earn­ings and, through their decisions, shape loc­al devel­op­ment, each tour­ism arrival becomes part of their own jour­ney toward empowerment.

Back to menu ^

Opportunities rise in Asia while threats linger globally

David Beirman, Adjunct Fellow, University of Technology Sydney, Australia

The biggest oppor­tun­ity for the glob­al tour­ism industry over the next five years is the shift­ing of its centre of grav­ity from Europe and North Amer­ica to Asia.

Dr David Beirman
Dr Dav­id Beirman

Tour­ism to and with­in Asia has grown expo­nen­tially since the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic slump largely ended in 2023. This resur­gence is driv­en by increased wealth in most Asi­an coun­tries coupled with effect­ive, innov­at­ive mar­ket­ing at both region­al and glob­al levels. All sec­tors stand to bene­fit when they invest in Asi­an tourism.

Region­ally, oppor­tun­it­ies emerge from mar­ket­ing ini­ti­at­ives such as the Asso­ci­ation of South­east Asi­an Nations (ASEAN) Tour­is­m’s incent­ives for trav­el­lers to vis­it mul­tiple South­east Asi­an des­tin­a­tions. These have made it easi­er and cheap­er to com­bine coun­tries. Mar­keters are now high­light­ing des­tin­a­tions pre­vi­ously neg­lected by inter­na­tion­al visitors.

Dis­per­sion of vis­it­a­tion and exper­i­ences is the nat­ur­al sus­tain­able anti­dote to over­tour­ism, which has plagued many attrac­tions. This dis­per­sion includes increas­ing points of trav­el­ler entry by air, sea, and land, and spread­ing attrac­tions, accom­mod­a­tion, and event infra­struc­ture through­out Asi­an countries.

How­ever, the biggest threat remains the resur­fa­cing of a glob­al crisis. As seen dur­ing the pan­dem­ic (2020 – 2023), gov­ern­ment reg­u­la­tions can grind tour­ism to a halt. Bey­ond health threats, wars, civil unrest, eco­nom­ic down­turns, wide­spread ter­ror­ism, polit­ic­al instabil­ity, and nat­ur­al dis­asters all have the poten­tial to severely dis­rupt tour­ism globally.

Back to menu ^

‘Community shared value’ is an opportunity and a threat

K Michael Haywood, publisher, ‘Destinations-in-Action’, Canada

Des­tin­a­tion man­age­ment organ­isa­tions (DMOs) have set their sights on achiev­ing ‘com­munity shared value’ (CSV) through tourism. 

Why pose it as both an oppor­tun­ity and a threat?

Wel­come to the world of des­tin­a­tions seek­ing to please every­body: vis­it­ors, loc­al gov­ern­ments, key stake­hold­ers, vis­it­or-serving organ­isa­tions, and citizens.

Can’t be done? 

Please, read the doc­u­ment endorsed by Des­tin­a­tions Inter­na­tion­al. It pur­ports to be a ‘val­ues-based roadmap for des­tin­a­tion organ­isa­tions to embrace com­munity align­ment’; an admir­able undertaking.

But not if com­mu­nic­a­tions about CSV are self-serving.

It is bound to arouse sus­pi­cion if cit­izens believe they are not deriv­ing value from tour­ism, or know it is being taken away. They see cor­por­ate greed, mis­spent mar­ket­ing expendit­ures, plum­met­ing ser­vice stand­ards, infla­tion, and crowding. They feel dis­pos­ses­sion and wit­ness spir­itu­al and cul­tur­al rot (e.g. ‘Lost Vegas’) along­side the mis­placed poet­ics of space and placemaking.

Ever since the concept of shared value was pop­ular­ised, it has been sub­jec­ted to con­sid­er­able cri­tique, not­ably for usurp­ing cor­por­ate social respons­ib­il­ity (CSR). Shared value can­not be sep­ar­ated from val­ues and beha­viours that dif­fer­en­ti­ate right from wrong; what is prefer­able versus what must be avoided.

Rein­teg­rat­ing busi­ness into soci­ety to regain pub­lic trust requires solu­tions to a range of diversity, equity, and inclu­sion (DEI) and envir­on­ment­al, social, and gov­ernance (ESG) chal­lenges. It requires com­mit­ments to improve the com­mon good, com­munity life, and the over­all well-being of cit­izens. And it needs ideas that stim­u­late ima­gin­a­tion and innovation.

Par­ti­cip­at­ory involve­ment in the affairs of DMOs is laud­at­ory. How­ever, in too many ‘com­munit­ies-as-des­tin­a­tions’, the social con­tract has been allowed to fray.

But all need not be lost.

Based on the uni­ver­sal value of ‘leave no one behind’, our com­munit­ies are far more likely to flour­ish when everyone’s hope and ration­al optim­ism are rein­vig­or­ated. As a pro­gress­ive concept, CSV requires a reima­gined roadmap.

Back to menu ^

Experiential travel, sustainability fatigue, overtourism, and HR challenges

Jeff Wilks, Psychologist, Consultant, Professor, Australia

Tour­ism is boom­ing, that’s a giv­en. Not only have pas­sen­ger num­bers recovered — and in many cases sur­passed pre-COV­ID levels — but there is also a new surge of people will­ing to travel widely for unique and per­son­al experiences.

Dr Jeff Wilks
Dr Jeff Wilks

Exper­i­en­tial travel presents the biggest oppor­tun­ity for the industry over the next five years, provided we can man­age tour­ist flows and deal with a couple of obvi­ous risks.

So what are tour­ists look­ing for, now and over the next five years?

Travel trend pre­dict­ors, like Mas­ter­card, Booking.com, and Kear­ney Con­sult­ing, high­light the import­ance of value for money, get­ting close to nature, and con­nect­ing with loc­al res­id­ents and their cul­tures. Tour­ists want authen­t­ic exper­i­ences and qual­ity ser­vice. Soft adven­ture, fam­ily-friendly, and well­ness are themes high on the list.

While there is con­tinu­ing interest and sup­port for sus­tain­ab­il­ity, a num­ber of industry reports note a grow­ing sus­tain­ab­il­ity fatigue.

To address this risk, it is sug­ges­ted des­tin­a­tions ensure that more sus­tain­able options are not only read­ily avail­able, but also easy to trust and under­stand. Cur­rently, cost and con­veni­ence trump sus­tain­ab­il­ity choices.

The second risk is over­tour­ism.

Des­tin­a­tions can be too suc­cess­ful, with crowding and con­ges­tion lead­ing to dimin­ished vis­it­or exper­i­ences and neg­at­ive impacts on nature, cul­ture, and loc­al communities.

Des­tin­a­tions can address this by pro­mot­ing less­er-known or altern­at­ive loc­a­tions, encour­aging low-sea­son travel, and vis­it­ing attrac­tions at off-peak hours. A recent Expe­dia sur­vey found 63% of con­sumers say they are likely to vis­it a ‘detour des­tin­a­tion’ on their next trip. Detour des­tin­a­tions are less well-known and less crowded than tour­ist hotspots.

Finally, deliv­er­ing authen­t­ic exper­i­ences with qual­ity ser­vice requires skilled and know­ledge­able staff. Trav­el­lers say they will pay a premi­um for qual­ity ser­vice, yet sev­er­al recent industry reports, includ­ing by UN Tour­ism, high­light ongo­ing staff­ing chal­lenges.

Back to menu ^


What do you think? 

In a com­ment below share your own thoughts about threats and oppor­tun­it­ies over the next five years

SIGN IN or REGISTER first. (After sign­ing in you will need to refresh this page to see the com­ments section.) 

Or write a “GT” Insight or “GT” Insight Bite of your own. The “Good Tour­ism” Blog wel­comes diversity of opin­ion and per­spect­ive about travel & tour­ism, because travel & tour­ism is everyone’s business.

This is an open invit­a­tion to travel & tour­ism stake­hold­ers from any back­ground to share their thoughts in plain Eng­lish with a glob­al industry audience.

“GT” doesn’t judge. “GT” pub­lishes. “GT” is where free thought travels.

If you think the tour­ism media land­scape is bet­ter with “GT” in it, then please … 

Back to menu ^


Previous “GT” Insight Bites

Featured image (top of post)

Tourism’s biggest threats, oppor­tun­it­ies: five years to 2030. A Gem­ini-gen­er­ated image. “GT” added the words.

Back to menu ^

Follow comments on this post
Please notify me of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.