Regenerative ecotourism: Asking questions is the best place to start

December 3, 2020

Overland track, Tasmania Wilderness. Image by pen_ash (CC0) via Pixabay. https://pixabay.com/photos/overland-track-tasmania-wilderness-4111331/
"Good Tourism" Premier Partnership is for a leading brand in travel & tourism

“Ask­ing ques­tions is the best place to start,” Anna Pol­lock said dur­ing the after­noon of the third and final day of the 2020 Glob­al Eco Asia-Pacific Tour­ism Con­fer­ence. And she’s right, of course, yet no-one got the oppor­tun­ity to ask her any!

Ms Pol­lock may be right about the bene­fit of ques­tions, but she’s obvi­ously not lit­er­ally cor­rect when she says the SARS-CoV­‑2 vir­us is a “mes­sen­ger”. (The more robot-ration­al among us would even pooh-pooh the fig­ur­at­ive notion.) How­ever, it is true that due to COVID-19 a great many people — all at once and all over the world — have been reminded that:

  • Uncer­tainty is a fact of life; 
  • Our vul­ner­ab­il­ity and inter­de­pend­ence is real; 
  • There are lim­its [emphas­is is Ms Pollock’s]; 
  • Oth­er exist­en­tial chal­lenges per­sist; and 
  • We’re not help­less vic­tims [emphas­is is your correspondent’s].

As founder of Conscious.Travel, Anna Pol­lock travels around (or did, pre-COV­ID) doing a lot of talk­ing to tour­ism audi­ences about “regen­er­a­tion”. Yet she would prefer to use the words “flour­ish­ing” or “thriv­ing”. 

Ms Pol­lock says there’s a jour­ney we must all embark upon if we are to move from degen­er­at­ive busi­ness-as-usu­al to regen­er­at­ive flour­ish­ing and thriv­ing. The route is via notions of “green”, “sus­tain­able”, and “res­tor­at­ive” in that order. It’s treach­er­ous, though. Be sure to pack a change of mind­set and a new way of think­ing, for they are neces­sary if we are to make it across the gap­ing chasm between “sus­tain­able” and “res­tor­at­ive”.

degen regen

Regen­er­a­tion involves remem­ber­ing; put­ting pieces back togeth­er. Remem­ber­ing includes “Earth wis­dom”, which Ms Pol­lock cred­its Indi­gen­ous peoples with hav­ing. And while her notion of regen­er­a­tion is sim­il­ar to the Maori word “Mauri”, which means “life force”, it should not be thought of as a noun. It’s a verb.

Ms Pol­lock is quite firm about this, so pay atten­tion: “Regen­er­a­tion” is not a trendy buzzword; nor is it “sus­tain­ab­il­ity on ster­oids”; nor is it simply “doing more good”; and it cer­tainly can­not be incre­ment­al (pre­sum­ably because there’s that chasm we might fall into if we take baby steps). Regen­er­a­tion, accord­ing to Ms Pol­lock, is about becom­ing one with the whole liv­ing sys­tem. We must devel­op the innate cap­ab­il­ity of a liv­ing sys­tem to self-organ­ise, thrive, and evolve. 

Cue lots of meta­phors: We must change our lens. We must trans­ition from dead machine to liv­ing sys­tem; assembly line to com­munity; silos and hier­arch­ies to one col­lab­or­at­ive net­work. Like a forest. Ego, eco, seva. Com­munity is to regen­er­at­ive tour­ism what soil is to regen­er­at­ive agriculture … 

Breathe!

Liv­ing sys­tems are self-organ­ising, she says. They cre­ate the con­di­tions for oth­er life. They are adapt­able and bal­anced; pro­duct­ive to the point of abund­ance, yet they pro­duce zero waste. They are unique yet they con­tinu­ally evolve.

And she asks, as if at the start: How do we put the heart and soul back into tour­ism? How do we stop extract­ing wealth and start gen­er­at­ing “well­th”? 😬 How do we stop ask­ing “What can coun­try do for tour­ism?” and start ask­ing “What can tour­ism do for country?” 

ego eco seva

So many questions …

Mov­ing right along … There were a lot of wide-ran­ging quick-fire present­a­tions dur­ing the third and final day of the 2020 Glob­al Eco Asia-Pacific Tour­ism Con­fer­ence. Here are a few high­lights. Again, same as yes­ter­day, these are only “high­lights” in terms of your cor­res­pond­ent being alert enough to take notes that might be of use, interest, or amuse­ment to you. There were talks you really had to be tuned in for and there were those your cor­res­pond­ent simply missed … per­haps because he’s not a liv­ing sys­tem else he would be per­fectly self-organ­ised and pro­duct­ive to the point of abund­ance while pro­du­cing zero waste!

‘Ecotourism is Aboriginal tourism’

Your cor­res­pond­ent found him­self doing a lot of listen­ing and not a lot of note-tak­ing dur­ing the present­a­tions around oppor­tun­it­ies for Australia’s first peoples; for surely it is they, with their oft-cited con­nec­tion with coun­try, who are the Aus­trali­ans best-placed to lead and innov­ate in the eco­tour­ism space. And indeed it was a joy­ful, excit­ing, and pos­it­ive series of talks.

Jeff McAl­ister of the Queens­land Depart­ment of Tour­ism, Innov­a­tion & Sport tipped his hat at West­ern Aus­tralia for being a lead­er in this space. He was fol­lowed by fel­low Queenslander Camer­on Cos­tello, chief of the Quan­damooka Yoo­loobur­ra­bee Abori­gin­al Cor­por­a­tion (QYAC), which rep­res­ents Quan­damooka coun­try near Bris­bane. Mr Cos­tello showed how QYAC is work­ing with loc­al gov­ern­ments, uni­ver­sit­ies, and indi­gen­ous and non-indi­gen­ous stake­hold­ers to devel­op, sup­port, and pro­mote place-based tour­ism products, enter­prises, train­ing, and employ­ment pathways. 

West­ern Australia’s Indi­gen­ous tour­ism industry was rep­res­en­ted by Rosie San­dover and Rebecca Sampi of King­fish­er Tours, which oper­ates in the Kim­ber­ley region. Present eld­er Ms Sampi views her­self as a rock of her com­munity and would encour­age young Indi­gen­ous women to give the tour­ism industry a go. She reck­ons travel & tour­ism ticks a few boxes as it provides oppor­tun­it­ies to: 

  • Connect/reconnect to country;
  • Com­mu­nic­ate its sig­ni­fic­ance to non-indi­geneous folks; 
  • Get a job; and eventually 
  • Start a business.

“Eco­tour­ism is Abori­gin­al tour­ism,” Robert Taylor, CEO of the West­ern Aus­trali­an Indi­gen­ous Tour­ism Oper­at­ors Coun­cil (WAITOC) said dur­ing his present­a­tion, provid­ing the per­fect sub-head­ing for this segment. 

He also expressed his pride at what WAITOC has been able to achieve. COVID hit hard in 2020, of course, includ­ing the can­cel­la­tion of a glob­al Indi­gen­ous tour­ism event that was to be hos­ted in Perth. How­ever, to help keep Indi­gen­ous tour oper­at­ors busy, WAITOC tar­geted its pro­mo­tions at WA intrastate trav­el­lers. This included a series of fun “Post­cards from our back­yard” videos that were well received. 

Abiotic, Biotic, Cultural, D, E, F, Geotourism, Holistic

The geo­tour­ism niche got a slot this morn­ing, with Patrick James of the Uni­ver­sity of South Aus­tralia and Angus M Robin­son, man­aging dir­ect­or of Leis­ure Solu­tions dis­cuss­ing the devel­op­ment of an Aus­trali­an nation­al geo­tour­ism strategy. Accord­ing to Mr Robin­son, geo­tour­ism is ABC: Abi­ot­ic, Biot­ic, and Cul­tur­al. It’s also “hol­ist­ic”. The new nation­al strategy seeks to cre­ate a united voice for geo­tour­ism in order to more effect­ively work with spe­cial­ist groups, gov­ern­ments, nat­ur­al & cul­tur­al her­it­age spe­cial­ists, and loc­al com­munit­ies. Prof James demon­strated an aug­men­ted and vir­tu­al real­ity product of the Wicked Witch­elina Dunes & Wild­flowers Geo­tour in South Australia. 

Liesegang Ring at Witchelina, South Australia. By KenjiSaki (CC BY-SA 4.0) via Wikimedia. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Liesegang_Ring_at_Witchelina_Photo_2.jpg
Lie­seg­ang Ring at Witch­elina, South Aus­tralia. By Kenji­Saki (CC BY-SA 4.0) via Wiki­me­dia.

‘It’s not ecotourism’

Tom Allen, cam­paign man­ager at the Wil­der­ness Soci­ety of Tas­mania, is wild about Tassie’s wil­der­ness but mad about state gov­ern­ment plans to privat­ise slices of it for tour­ism devel­op­ment. Tasmania’s Wil­der­ness World Her­it­age Area is one of the last expanses of tem­per­ate wil­der­ness. It ticks off a unique com­bin­a­tion of World Her­it­age cri­ter­ia, which Mr Allen reck­ons makes Tassie’s WHA the “best” on Earth. Pro­tect­ing it is in the long-term interest of Tas­mania and Tassie tour­ism, Mr Allen asserts. 

Des­pite wil­der­ness being the biggest draw­card for tour­ism in Tas­mania, and des­pite all mar­ket seg­ments sur­veyed rank­ing it a top attrac­tion, offi­cial state gov­ern­ment tour­ism policy is volume-focused with no men­tion of wil­der­ness at all. Accord­ing to Mr Allen, the gov­ern­ment plans to “unlock the poten­tial of parks” through private high-end tour­ism devel­op­ments, such as a lux­ury resort on Halls Island, Lake Mal­bena in the Walls of Jer­u­s­alem Nation­al Park. Access to the prop­erty would be via heli­copter. Any new pro­ject degrades the “wil­der­ness char­ac­ter” of a place, he reck­ons, and this par­tic­u­lar pro­ject tar­geted at the very wealthy is highly inap­pro­pri­ate and “lacks social licence”. 

And “it’s not ecotourism”.

Wildlife tourism best practices

In research­ing a report com­mis­sioned by UNWTO and Chimel­ong about good prac­tices in wild­life tour­ism in Asia & the Pacific, Dr Ronda Green, chair of Wild­life Tour­ism Aus­tralia, found lots of good examples in the region. The best included Borneo Eco Lodge (Malay­sia); Lady Elli­ot Island (Aus­tralia); Rimba Oran­gutan Lodge (Indone­sia); Wild­life of the Mon­go­li­an Steppe (Mon­go­lia); and Aar­unya Tour to Sin­ha­raja (Sri Lanka). Moreover Dr Green encountered lots of well-inten­ded oper­a­tions will­ing and able to do bet­ter with the right inform­a­tion, guid­ance, and support. 

Com­mon prob­lems faced by wild­life tour­ism oper­a­tions in Asia Pacific include: 

  • Guests’ expect­a­tions for stand­ards of lux­ury or ser­vice often exceed what the real­ity is (man­age them); 
  • Poor infra­struc­ture (roads, tele­com­mu­nic­a­tions, inter­net etc); 
  • Real and per­ceived safety concerns;
  • Lan­guage (trans­la­tions of inter­pret­ive mater­i­al; com­mu­nic­a­tions with staff); 
  • Lack of gov­ern­ment interest in the environment; 
  • Com­pet­i­tion with low-stand­ard wild­life oper­a­tions (e.g. those that allow feeding; 
  • Bal­an­cing the needs of vis­it­ors and locals.

Gaps in the market: 

  • Rel­at­ive lack of botan­ic­al tours; 
  • Lack of online promotion; 
  • Lack of safari-style products in the region; 
  • Oppor­tun­it­ies to engage people in cit­izen science; 
  • Cer­tain seg­ments are under-served and/or under-tar­geted, such as school groups, seni­ors, and the differently-abled.

Measuring sticks

frameworks

Camer­on Balch, a Mas­ters stu­dent at the Uni­ver­sity of Queens­land, explored the ques­tion of why there are so many tools for meas­ur­ing and cer­ti­fy­ing eco­tour­ism and sus­tain­able tour­ism; their over­lap, anom­alies, and oppor­tun­it­ies. Their pro­lif­er­a­tion is under­stand­able giv­en their dif­fer­ent scopes, pri­or­it­ies, loc­a­tions, geo­graph­ies, organ­isa­tions, under­ly­ing motivations,et cet­era. Mr Balch stud­ied a sample of 17 dif­fer­ent eco- and/or sus­tain­able indic­at­or sets, includ­ing Eco­tour­ism Aus­trali­a’s, using two frame­works for com­par­is­on: Dimen­sions of sus­tain­ab­il­ity and the driver-pres­sure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) caus­al chain framework. 

Curi­ously, Eco­tour­ism Aus­trali­a’s is the only set with edu­ca­tion indic­at­ors yet is also the only one without eco­nom­ic indic­at­ors. And while it is the only one to include impact indic­at­ors it has very few driver and pres­sure indic­at­ors. Both these curi­os­it­ies means EA’s set of meas­ures is rel­at­ively unique; while most of the oth­ers stud­ied were rel­at­ively sim­il­ar to each oth­er. In con­clu­sion, Mr Balch said that the industry as a whole needed to find more com­mon ground around min­im­um stand­ards for eco- and sus­tain­able tourism.

Sustainable marketing

Sus­tain­able des­tin­a­tions and exper­i­ences deserve “more sus­tain­able mar­ket­ing”, accord­ing to Carl Solomon, dir­ect­or at Des­tin­a­tion Mar­ket­ing Store. The pile-on of prob­lems in 2020 has, he reckons:

Global Eco Asia-Pacific Tourism Conference 2020, December 1 – 3, Margaret River, Western Australia
  • Influ­enced motiv­a­tions, beha­viours, and bar­ri­ers to travel;
  • Increased the import­ance of trus­ted recom­mend­a­tions (friends and family);
  • Increased demand for escapes from the city and nature-based/e­co­tour­ism products; and
  • Increased demand for hassle-free experiences.

Aus­trali­ans have tra­di­tion­ally been less likely to book domest­ic travel unless it’s off the beaten track, but they do book over­seas exper­i­ences. The oppor­tun­ity dur­ing the shut­down of inter­na­tion­al tour­ism has been to cap­ture an Aus­trali­an mar­ket that would have nor­mally gone overseas. 

In the “new nor­mal”, Mr Solomon reck­ons travel & tour­ism pro­viders should:

  • Offer more per­son­al­ised products;
  • Provide a stronger con­nec­tion to people and place;
  • Use mul­tiple chan­nels of distribution;
  • Adapt to and lever­age digit­al innovation

They should also:

  • Pos­i­tion com­munity at the centre of everything (with vis­it­ing friends and rel­at­ives and then every­one else in con­cent­ric circles around that loc­al core);
  • Cre­ate more remark­able con­tent (with the right focus; the right audi­ence; and the right channels)
  • Reach — inspire — engage — con­nect with audi­ences, and repeat.

The 2020 Glob­al Eco Asia-Pacific Tour­ism Con­fer­ence took place Decem­ber 1 – 3, 2020 in Mar­garet River, West­ern Aus­tralia. Kudos to the organ­isers and MCs for their superb time man­age­ment, des­pite the tech­nic­al chal­lenges of tele­con­fer­en­cing with so many speak­ers; keep­ing speak­ers to their time lim­its and hit­ting every time tar­get with­in a few minutes at most. (Because time­keep­ing can be an issue at industry events.)

Fea­tured image (top of post): Over­land track, Tas­mania Wil­der­ness. Image by pen_ash (CC0) via Pixabay.

Related posts

Follow comments on this post
Please notify me of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.