Signalling or substance in tourism: What’s your take?
Signalling or substance: What’s your assessment of the current balance between ‘virtue signalling’ and genuine ‘best practice’ in the tourism industry where you live, work, or operate?
UPDATE July 16, 2025 — Your “Good Tourism” Insight Bites
Thanks to the following five respondents for taking the time to share their thoughts. Their responses appear in the order received. [Click/touch a Bites menu item to go straight to it.]
Bites menu
- British youth hostel history shows ‘signalling can lead to substance’
- In southern Thailand, ‘virtue signalling remains common’
- Cambodia’s tourism sector ‘must move beyond marketing claims’
- Bend, Oregon, USA: ‘Come for the brews and views, stay for the virtue’
- In rural and remote BC, Canada, tourism’s best practice is survival
- ‘Platitudes, signalling, grandstanding erode trust and credibility’
- What do you think?
- Previous “GT” Insight Bites
- Featured image (top of post)
British youth hostel history shows that ‘signalling can lead to substance’
Duncan M Simpson, writer, Simply Hostels and Light travels, UK
The balance between signal and substance doesn’t matter. Signals can bring about substance, as I’ve learned from studying the history of youth hostels and holidaymaking in England and Wales.
To help all, but especially young people, to a greater knowledge, care and love of the countryside.
When first founded with that aim, the Youth Hostels Association of England and Wales had no hostels and no members. It was a signal of virtuous intent. The signal worked. It became substance.
The first youth hostels opened in Britain in 1931.
For people staying in them, the countryside became somewhere no longer strange. It became a place they loved. They went there as often as they could. They holidayed in its peace and beauty. Many campaigned for others to have equal access to nature … and to protect it.
The YHA campaigned with others for national parks. Legislation in 1949 brought widespread protection of the countryside; the first British national parks.
YHA members became activists for the countryside. They lobbied against dams that drowned lovely valleys. And they campaigned against by-passes and big roads while continuing to fight for broader access for all, especially young people.
Campaigners like Len Clarke, Pauline Dower, Herbert Gatliff, and Tom Stephenson were well known associates of YHA. They first experienced youth hostels in the 1930s; a formative influence on them all.
Many other YHA members joined committees, wrote letters, and demonstrated their love, knowledge, and understanding of the countryside.
Youth hostels reaped the reward of their signalling. The early hope was more than fulfilled.
So, signalling can lead to substance. In many ways the balance between them at any particular moment doesn’t really matter.
In southern Thailand, ‘while virtue signalling remains common, we feel encouraged’
Chris Kittishinnakuppe, Head of Marketing & Sales, VHG Hospitality Asia, Thailand
In our region, Khao Sok in southern Thailand, sustainability has become a much more prominent topic in recent years. However, the balance between virtue signalling and genuine best practices is still uneven.

Many tourism operators have recognised that today’s travellers expect a strong commitment to environmental responsibility. This has led some businesses to promote surface-level initiatives, such as removing plastic straws or displaying vague ‘eco-friendly’ signage without making more substantial operational changes. In reality, this is often more about marketing than meaningful impact.
At Anurak Community Lodge, we see this as a short-sighted approach. Guests are increasingly informed and curious. They want to know how waste is managed, where products are sourced, how energy is used, and whether communities truly benefit. Superficial gestures alone no longer meet this expectation for honesty.
Authentic best practices (with measurable results), on the other hand, take sustained effort and investment. For us, that has meant restoring degraded land through our Rainforest Rising project, installing composting and greywater recycling systems, rethinking our supply chains to favour local producers, and building staff skills over time.
These initiatives may not always be flashy, but they lead to tangible benefits for biodiversity, local economies, and guest learning.
Across the industry, more operators are beginning to adopt this more profound commitment, although a noticeable gap remains between intentions and actual action. Progress depends on stronger certifications, transparent reporting, and collaboration to lift standards across the sector.
While virtue signalling remains common, we feel encouraged. As travellers increasingly support businesses that prove their commitment, the industry will have to evolve beyond slogans. We see this shift as essential for protecting Khao Sok’s extraordinary natural and cultural heritage well into the future.
Anurak Community Lodge is a valued “Good Tourism” Partner.
In Cambodia ‘the tourism sector must move beyond marketing claims’
Chris Kittishinnakuppe, Head of Marketing & Sales, VHG Hospitality Asia, Thailand
In Cambodia, conversations about sustainable tourism have become more prominent over the past decade. Increasingly, operators market themselves as ‘eco-friendly’, and terms such as ‘green’ and ‘community-based’ are frequently used in promotions. However, a significant gap remains between virtue signalling and genuine best practice.

As in southern Thailand, where VHG also operates, many businesses in Cambodia adopt surface-level measures, such as reducing plastic straws or adding a few local dishes to the menu, while continuing to operate in ways that strain natural resources or contribute little to local communities. This can give visitors the impression that sustainability is being taken seriously when, in reality, deeper systemic issues remain unaddressed.
At Cardamom Tented Camp, we see sustainability as the foundation of our purpose, not just an add-on. Our model is built around protecting the 18,000 hectares of forest that surround us.
Each guest’s stay directly supports ranger patrols aimed at preventing illegal logging and poaching. We utilise renewable energy, limit our capacity to reduce pressure on the environment, manage waste responsibly, and maintain transparent partnerships with the Wildlife Alliance and the Ministry of Environment. These efforts require significant time, funding, and continuous improvement.
While we are encouraged to see more operators adopting the language of sustainability, the tourism sector must move beyond marketing claims.
Genuine best practice depends on clear commitments, verified impact, and collaboration with conservation and community partners who hold each other accountable. Travellers increasingly expect this transparency. They want to see how their visit contributes to conservation and local livelihoods.
Virtue signalling undermines trust and risks damaging Cambodia’s unique natural assets.
Our goal at Cardamom Tented Camp is to demonstrate that meaningful and responsible tourism can protect forests, empower communities, and lead by example.
Cardamom Tented Camp is a valued “Good Tourism” Partner.
Bend, Oregon, USA: ‘Come for the brews and views, stay for the virtue’
Ed Jackiewicz, Professor, California State University, Northridge, USA
In Bend, Oregon, tourism isn’t just epic mountain views and craft beer. It’s also about doing good while having a good time.
But how much of that eco-conscious messaging is authentic, and how much is just marketing fluff?
The answer: a bit of both, but the scales tip in the right direction.
Visit Bend, the city’s tourism office, has leaned into sustainability in a big way. They launched the Bend Sustainability Fund in 2021, funnelling 15% of their budget — around US$3 million so far — into restoring the river, sprucing up trails, and supporting community spaces.
And the culture scene? It’s growing with help from the Bend Cultural Tourism Fund, supporting inclusive events like Winter PrideFest and the Latinx Outdoor Film Fest. It’s not just a brochure tagline; there’s real money behind it and the city is better for it.
On the numbers side: In 2023, Bend brought in $383.4 million in visitor spending, with 3,470 tourism jobs created. Lodging sales dipped slightly by 3.1%, but that may be due to more glampers and an increasing amount of VFR (visiting friends and relatives) tourists. In addition, transient room taxes raked in over $26 million between the city and county.
Bend remains the #1 Oregon road trip spot, so the Subaru parade isn’t slowing down. (Subarus are wildly abundant throughout the Pacific Northwest and have become somewhat of a cliche!)
Sure, some may roll their eyes at the ubiquitous feel-good messaging. But with real dollars funding real improvements, it’s hard to call it all fluff. Bend’s tourism game might be a little smug, but at least it’s earning that smug.
Bottom line: In Bend, sustainability isn’t just a buzzword, it’s a lifestyle involving mountain bikes and microbrews embraced by locals and tourists alike.
In rural and remote BC, Canada, tourism’s best practice is survival
Richard Butler, Emeritus Professor, University of Strathclyde, Scotland
Virtue signalling is almost absent in Prince Rupert, British Columbia, Canada, which is perhaps a reflection of rural rather than big city viewpoints (mental not scenic). Prince Rupert is a small and isolated community, 150 kms from the next town.
Tourism in Prince Rupert has a number of related elements:
- Cruise tourists (stopping en route to and from Alaska);
- Tourists by train or car (exploring Canada’s end of the line and road);
- Sportspeople chasing fish (salmon) and game (deer);
- Visitors seeking Indigenous experiences; and
- Short-haul (under 500 kms) tourists.
The offerings to cruise visitors are split between those organised (at ludicrous prices) by the cruise ships and those offered and owned locally. Neither are guilty of virtue signalling, although some, especially the former, are often guilty of hype and inaccuracies.
Experiences that might be considered authentic are mostly just that. Indigenous owned and managed opportunities exist and are mostly of a good standard.
Genuine best practice? Probably not compared to the wider meaning of the term.
Most operators are aiming for best practice as they understand the term and to the extent they are able to implement it. They are aware of their competition and realise they have to be at least equal if not better than their competitors, so ‘best practice’ is almost survival mode. In such a remote place, a business has to be effective and efficient to survive.
Conclusions? In relative isolation, key elements such as authenticity, reliability, and uniqueness are critically important to the tourism economy in Prince Rupert.
Virtue signalling, if ever contemplated, appears to be viewed as irrelevant and/or unnecessary here. Not everything is perfect or politically correct in some eyes, but the focus is very much on economic survival in an appropriate manner.
‘Punishing platitudes, norm signalling, and grandstanding erode trust and credibility’
K Michael Haywood, publisher, ‘Destinations-in-Action’, Canada
Virtually all organisations and destinations sell themselves through their virtues. The ‘why’ is obvious: To put their best face forward, to reveal moral character and correctness.
Yet, why are so few able to demonstrate the longer-term performative value of their virtues and virtuous actions in consideration of what, and for whom?
When Destinations International launched its community shared value (CSV) initiative, its members recognised the benefits that could be derived for themselves. Many, facing declines in marketing budgets, needed to signal how their marketing allowed everyone involved to derive favorable returns on investment (ROI); how their brand of tourism showcased a community and fashioned an identity that was economically, socially, environmentally, and culturally conciliatory and complementary.
As such, CSV is often viewed as self-serving. Too many DMOs and organisations just don‘t understand the original intent of shared value and the importance of creating collective impact through meaningful action, needs, and experiences.
Consider tourism workforces that are living on the margins; where housing isn’t readily available or affordable. Is that because corporate social responsibility (CSR) proclamations around staff welfare are vacuous and lack accountability?
Virtue signalling cannot afford to be viewed as pretense. Punishing platitudes, norm signalling, and grandstanding erode trust and credibility. Superficial engagement with social and environmental causes generate psychological stress among those who know better.
No destination or organisation can afford to be vague about manifesting their virtues. When deep listening leads to focused intention and spirited action communicated through resonant stories, virtues can be — must be — demonstrable, real, and magnanimous.
The jump from aspiration to realisation, however, requires the engagement of entire communities, and the participation of supply and value-creation networks. Community and organisational leaders must be forthcoming and provide the necessary support and financing to achieve virtuous outcomes.
What do you think?
In a comment below share your own thoughts about virtue signalling and genuine best practice in travel & tourism.
SIGN IN or REGISTER first. (After signing in you will need to refresh this page to see the comments section.)
Or write a “GT” Insight or “GT” Insight Bite of your own. The “Good Tourism” Blog welcomes diversity of opinion and perspective about travel & tourism, because travel & tourism is everyone’s business.
This is an open invitation to travel & tourism stakeholders from any background to share their thoughts in plain English with a global industry audience.
“GT” doesn’t judge. “GT” publishes. “GT” is where free thought travels.
If you think the tourism media landscape is better with “GT” in it, then please …
Previous “GT” Insight Bites
- Visitor value, values, volume: What’s good where you are?
- Outbound doesn’t care about sustainability | Well-being must include meaning
- Is a travel & tourism career still attractive? Important things to understand in 2025
- Wishwashing tourism
- Butler’s conundrum: Air travel and ‘sustainable’ tourism
- What is tourism’s biggest opportunity and/or threat where you are in 2025?
- “GT” Insight Bites: Nostalgia
- “GT” Insight Bites: Geopolitics and tourism
- Tourism stakeholders: Who has an outsized voice? Who has no voice? Who cares?
- Would you abolish taxes on tips?
- Three critics walk into a bar …
- How are emerging technologies transforming the travel & tourism industry?
- What does it mean to be critical of tourism?
- What constitutes ‘progress’ for travel & tourism in 2024?
- Considering a career in tourism? Important things you should know in 2024
- What did tourism learn from the COVID-19 pandemic?
- In 2024, what are the best opportunities for tourism over the next five years?
- Tourism’s biggest challenges & threats over the next five years to 2028
- On empowerment, promotion, and the power of expression
- On enrichment, repatriation, the double-edged blade, and war
- On tourism technology, progress, and local benefit-sharing
- Hey, travel & tourism, are you ‘neocolonialist’?
- Who’s the new boss? Asia Pacific tourism industry association seeks leader
- ‘The hospitality industry offers a great career.’ Really?
- Cruise ships: Blessing or blight?
- Tourist vs traveller: What’s the difference?
- The heads of finance, operations, and PR walk into their boss’s office …
- Yes, Tourism Minister
- What are tourism’s biggest challenges & threats over the next five years?
- ‘Tourism is built on the backbone of white supremacy’. What do you think?
- Really, what’s the difference? ‘Sustainable tourism’ vs ‘regenerative tourism’
- Want a career in tourism? Important things you should know
- Diverse perspectives on travel & tourism and a fairer world
- Diverse perspectives on economic degrowth and tourism
- Diverse perspectives on visitor dispersion
Featured image (top of post)
Signalling or substance in tourism: What’s your take? Image generated by Gemini AI. “GT” cropped it and added the words.








