Prof Valeria Minghetti on peer review, overtourism, regenerative tourism, and how to succeed
âNevÂer stop askÂing yourÂself quesÂtions. CuriÂosÂity and the desire to find soluÂtions is what makes a difÂferÂence,â accordÂing to ValerÂia Minghetti.
Such an attiÂtude will take youngÂsters a long way in travel & tourÂism, she reckons.
And it must be redoubled at the very highest levels of acaÂdemia and industry.
Saverio F BerÂtoÂluÂcci interÂviewed Prof Minghetti for a Tourismâs HoriÂzon InterÂview. For this âGood TourÂismâ Insight, Mr BerÂtoÂluÂcci idenÂtiÂfies his highÂlights. [The full tranÂscript is on Substack.]
Table of Contents
- Who is ProÂfessÂor ValerÂia Minghetti?
- Itâs time to review the peer-review process
- OverÂtourÂism: A funcÂtion of space and time
- The promÂise of regenÂerÂatÂive tourism
- IntuÂition, curiÂosÂity, sciÂence, and belief
- What do you think?
- About the author
- About the Tourismâs HoriÂzon Interviews
Who is Professor Valeria Minghetti?
ProÂfessÂor ValerÂia Minghetti, Chief Research DirÂectÂor at CISET, the InterÂnaÂtionÂal Centre for StudÂies on TourÂism EcoÂnomÂics, UniÂversitĂ Caâ Foscari, Venice, Italy, repÂresÂents the perÂfect conÂverÂgence of acaÂdemia and hospitality.
An estabÂlished expert in ecoÂnomÂics and tourÂism develÂopÂment whose fields of expertÂise have grown to the point where there are almost no boundÂarÂies, Prof Minghettiâs acaÂdemÂic career spans three decÂades and is a blend of many difÂferÂent knowÂledge dimenÂsions, includÂing informÂaÂtion techÂnoÂlogy, transÂport, and micro- and macroeconomics.
ValerÂia has parÂtiÂcipÂated in many nationÂal and interÂnaÂtionÂal conÂferÂences as well as conÂtribÂuted to proÂjects led by the European UniÂon and othÂer interÂnaÂtionÂal institutions.
She is curÂrently a memÂber of the sciÂentifÂic comÂmitÂtees of BTO (Be Travel Online) and ENTER (the annuÂal conÂferÂence by the InterÂnaÂtionÂal FedÂerÂaÂtion for IT and Travel & TourÂism), and she sits on the editÂorÂiÂal board of the JournÂal of InformÂaÂtion TechÂnoÂlogy & TourÂism.
Itâs time to review the peer-review process
ValerÂia MinghetÂtiâs conÂtent gateÂkeepÂing experÂiÂence for industry events and journÂals lends weight to her conÂcerns about the way ideas and opinÂions are perÂpetuÂated. She has long noticed how an alarmÂing numÂber of indiÂviduÂals exploit their self-proÂclaimed expertÂise to proÂpose ideas without solÂid evidence.
ProÂfessÂor Minghetti asserts that while a culÂture of freeÂdom of speech remains foundÂaÂtionÂal to any truth-seekÂing endeavÂour, it can be exploited by those who wish to proÂmulÂgate perÂsonÂal beliefs and ideoÂlogy at the expense of truth; parÂticÂuÂlarly in situÂations where there is no time and space givÂen to good-faith criÂtiÂcism, open debate, and imparÂtial peer review.
âThere are often papers presenÂted in tourÂism journÂals writÂten by authors with non-tourÂism expertÂise, who use tourÂism as a mere field of experÂiÂmentÂaÂtion to have one more opporÂtunÂity to pubÂlish, without havÂing real knowÂledge of the pheÂnomenÂon. This can lead to banal or wrong conÂcluÂsions, preÂcisely because they do not have the eleÂments to corÂrectly interÂpret what their modÂel anaÂlyses. It would be worth being more cauÂtious about this.â
This raises the issue of alleged corÂrupÂtion in acaÂdemia. It also highÂlights the need for a debate about the efficÂacy of peer-review processes.
On the othÂer hand, ValerÂia notes that not all pubÂlicÂaÂtions are poorly run; and that mulÂtidiscipÂlinÂarÂity is cruÂcial to studÂies of tourÂism due to the cross-cutÂting nature of the pheÂnomenÂon. She points to an example highÂlightÂing the rich insights that can be gleaned from studyÂing tourÂism through the lens of anothÂer field: TourÂism, techÂnoÂloÂgies and comÂpetÂitÂive strategies by AuliÂana Poon; one of the first works to anaÂlyse the relaÂtionÂship between informÂaÂtion techÂnoÂlogy and tourism.
Overtourism: A function of space and time
âGenÂerÂally, no desÂtinÂaÂtion sufÂfers from total overtourism.â
ValerÂia Minghettiâs simple and dirÂect stateÂment sums up the unuseÂfulÂness of the term âoverÂtourÂismâ. It can be replaced by âmisÂmanÂageÂmentâ, which is usuÂally calÂcuÂlated in space and time dimenÂsions. In othÂer words, excessÂive visÂitÂor inflows hapÂpen in speÂcifÂic periÂods and in speÂcifÂic areas but are not overÂwhelmÂingly present all year, and are not perÂceived as a probÂlem by everyone.
Prof Minghetti says that much misÂmanÂageÂment hapÂpens in the early develÂopÂment stages of a desÂtinÂaÂtion, when it is first âdisÂcoveredâ by travÂelÂlers and word quickly spreads. That tourÂism might become and remain a net negÂatÂive for host comÂmunitÂies over the longer term is a funcÂtion of wrongÂdoÂing or incomÂpetÂence by poliÂcyÂmakers and managers.
AccordÂing to ValerÂia, the rapÂid demoÂcratÂisaÂtion of tourÂism through rising globÂal ecoÂnomÂic and social prosperÂity has resÂulÂted in a boom in tourÂism demand from 100s of milÂlions more people who hereÂtoÂfore nevÂer had the time nor resources for it. This has increased demand for estabÂlished desÂtinÂaÂtions and exposed new places to disÂcovÂery too.
UnforÂtuÂnately there have always been indiÂviduÂals who think that they can do whatever they want, wherever they want, with the conÂsequent risk of conÂflict between citÂizens and visÂitÂors. With more travÂelÂlers and tourÂists, there are more of them too. And they have reach and influÂence via the internet.
âThere is often little or disÂtorÂted knowÂledge [âŠ] of places and a lack of critÂicÂal thinkÂing behind oneâs actions. In pracÂtice, digitÂisaÂtion, instead of creÂatÂing a genÂerÂal beneÂfit, ends up genÂerÂatÂing a negÂatÂive effect on peopleâs behaviour.
âThe awareÂness, on the part of potenÂtial visÂitÂors, of posÂsible stressÂful situÂations (which would also be detÂriÂmentÂal to their enjoyÂment) could genÂerÂate difÂferÂent choices. Choices that, because of their nature, would not be definÂable as âlimÂitsâ per se, in social terms. Not least because setÂting a limÂit is equiÂvalÂent to [âŠ] definÂing a maxÂimÂum access threshold, which can be easÂily idenÂtiÂfied for closed places (e.g., a museum), or bounded, such as an island or a park, but hardly for an open place, such as a city.â
The promise of regenerative tourism
TourÂism growth has always been a potenÂtial posÂitÂive, espeÂcially in places where tourÂism can be âthe main driver of ecoÂnomÂic develÂopÂmentâ. The chalÂlenge is to âensure an equitÂable disÂtriÂbuÂtion of the wealth derived from it at the locÂal levelâ.
To this end, ValerÂia Minghetti thinks that the regenÂerÂatÂive tourÂism trend is promÂising in that it moves âbeyÂond the conÂcepts of susÂtainÂabÂilÂity and responsÂibÂilÂity to tourÂism that genÂerÂates real locÂal value and well-beingâ for all.
Prof Minghetti points to the Future of TourÂism CoaliÂtion and its list of 13 core prinÂciples:
âAmong them the importÂance of mainÂtainÂing a genÂerÂal overÂview of desÂtinÂaÂtions and their charÂacÂterÂistÂics, which means includÂing tourÂism in an overÂall desÂtinÂaÂtion develÂopÂment plan; aimÂing for qualÂity over quantÂity of tourÂists attracÂted; redeÂfinÂing metÂrics for evalÂuÂatÂing ecoÂnomÂic sucÂcess; encourÂaging cirÂcuÂlar use of resources; limÂitÂing land conÂsumpÂtion for tourÂism purÂposes; diverÂsiÂfyÂing tourÂism demand; encourÂaging proxÂimÂity tourÂism; [and] proÂtectÂing a destinationâs inner identityâ.
The posÂitÂive conÂsequences of regenÂerÂatÂive tourÂism do not stop there. Its âtourÂism for allâ approach potenÂtially maxÂimÂises diversity in terms of not only visÂitÂors but also the tourÂism talÂents that cater to them; the latÂter susÂtained through an approÂpriÂate work/life balance.
Intuition, curiosity, science, and belief
Of course I had to ask such a wise and experÂiÂenced figÂure how young talÂents may sucÂceed in tourism.
ValerÂia Minghetti:
âListen to your intuÂitions. Even if anaÂlytÂicÂal thinkÂing has been proÂmoted [over] âgut feelÂingsâ, espeÂcially in [the West], intuÂition repÂresÂents a difÂferÂent way to elabÂorÂate informÂaÂtion. SomeÂtimes our brain knows what is good for us before we are aware of it. This applies to your study and work choices, but also to the resÂolÂuÂtion of a problem [âŠ]
âSecondly, be curiÂous. NevÂer stop askÂing yourÂself quesÂtions. CuriÂosÂity and the desire to find soluÂtions is what makes a difference [âŠ]
âFinally, if you are interÂested in workÂing in tourÂism research and conÂsultancy, rememÂber that tourÂism by its nature is an applied sciÂence. [âŠ] Use sciÂentifÂic methÂods to find approaches [that help make] the tourÂism sysÂtem more susÂtainÂable and comÂpetÂitÂive: do not use tourÂism just to test your theories.â
ValerÂia invites young talÂents, whatever their backÂground and whoÂever they hapÂpen to be, to believe in themÂselves, chalÂlenge themÂselves, and to work towards a brightÂer future.
What do you think?
Share your own thoughts in a comÂment below. (SIGN IN or REGISTER first. After signÂing in you will need to refresh this page to see the comÂments section.)
Or write a âGTâ Insight or âGTâ Insight Bite of your own. The âGood TourÂismâ Blog welÂcomes diversity of opinÂion and perÂspectÂive about travel & tourÂism, because travel & tourÂism is everyoneâs business.
âGTâ doesnât judge. âGTâ pubÂlishes. âGTâ is where free thought travels.
If you think the tourÂism media landÂscape is betÂter with âGTâ in it, then please âŠ
About the author

Saverio Francesco BerÂtoÂluÂcci studÂied interÂnaÂtionÂal tourÂism & leisÂure at UniÂversitĂ di Bologna, Italy and susÂtainÂable tourÂism develÂopÂment at AalÂborg UniÂverÂsity, DenÂmark.
CurÂrently workÂing as a comÂmerÂcial assistÂant with VDB LuxÂury PropÂerÂties in BarÂcelona, Spain, the quadÂriÂlinÂgual ItaliÂan is interÂested in desÂtinÂaÂtion manÂageÂment, the experÂiÂence ecoÂnomy, and cusÂtomÂer care, and has a pasÂsion for social susÂtainÂabÂilÂity, remote tourÂism, and co-creation.
About the Tourismâs Horizon Interviews
âGood TourÂismâ Insight PartÂner Tourismâs HoriÂzon: Travel for the MilÂlions, in colÂlabÂorÂaÂtion with âGTâ, has sought the canÂdid views of well-known and respecÂted experts on tourismâs past, present, and future.
The Tourismâs HoriÂzon InterÂviews involves Jim Butcher, VilÂhelmiÂina VainÂikka, Peter Smith, Saverio Francesco BerÂtoÂluÂcci, DavÂid JarÂratt, and SudipÂta Sarkar as interÂviewÂers. The âGood TourÂismâ Blog will pubÂlish their highÂlights and comÂmentÂary as âGTâ Insights.
Read the full tranÂscripts of each interÂview on Tourismâs Horizonâs substack.




![Prof Valeria Minghetti on peer review, overtourism, regenerative tourism, and how to succeed 6 Professor Richard Butler on tourismâs challenges and academiaâs inadequacies ... "[Don't] let wishful thinking take precedence over logic"](https://www.goodtourismblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/Prof-Richard-Butler-on-tourisms-challenges-and-academias-inadequacies-300x225.jpg)
