By invitation only: Sustainable tourism revisited

May 19, 2020

Is tourism greed good or should tourism be by invitation only? Image supplied by author.
"Good Tourism" Premier Partnership is for a leading brand in travel & tourism

For truly sus­tain­able tour­ism to have a chance, indi­vidu­al des­tin­a­tions and host com­munit­ies must use the coronavir­us crisis to take back con­trol from glob­al fin­an­cial interests after dec­ades of failed talks at the highest levels. This is accord­ing to Dr Thomas Bauer in a fresh and reflect­ive “GT” Insight; his second. Indeed Dr Bauer reck­ons vis­it­a­tion should be by invit­a­tion … only.

This peri­od of self-isol­a­tion and no travel offers an oppor­tun­ity for per­son­al reflec­tion on how tour­ism has evolved over my lifetime.

I have been a trav­el­ler for 60 of my 66 years and what has motiv­ated me since my earli­est days has always been a curi­os­ity to find out what is over the moun­tain, across the river, or the oth­er side of the bor­der. What is life like there? What do people look like, what do they eat and do?

In the 1960s there were no travel shows on black and white TVs, no You­Tube chan­nel, no inter­net. Maps were the focus of my atten­tion. I would mar­vel at the far-off places and hoped that one day I could travel there.

When I did start to travel inde­pend­ently in the late 1970s to places like North Africa and South Amer­ica I had to rely on maps and guide­books to show me the way. Writ­ing and receiv­ing let­ters was the main form of com­mu­nic­a­tion with my home base. Every day brought new experiences.

Now, in my later years, I look back on all the inter­est­ing and diverse places I have vis­ited on all sev­en con­tin­ents and note that tour­ism has become very com­mer­cial. Cit­ies all look the same. Too many people crowd into attrac­tions, such as museums, his­tor­ic or reli­gious sites, and nat­ur­al places. And too many people are trav­el­ling around the world at the same time.

It used to be a priv­ilege to go trav­el­ling but now it is con­sidered a right. This may be so with­in people’s own com­munity but it is not the case when vis­it­ing oth­er com­munit­ies where it should be con­sidered a priv­ilege. It should be by invit­a­tion only.

It fol­lows that, like for every theatre per­form­ance, foot­ball match, Olympic Games etc, vis­it­ors should be required to have an invit­a­tion from loc­al author­it­ies and a reser­va­tion to be allowed to vis­it the sites and sights that are out­side their usu­al places of res­id­ence. This would imply that tour­ism needs to slow down and be more strictly con­trolled to be more sustainable.

Sus­tain­able tour­ism has of course been dis­cussed for dec­ades. I had the pleas­ure to chair the sus­tain­able tour­ism ses­sion at the Pacific Asia Travel Association’s annu­al con­fer­ence in Nagoya, Japan in 1999. That year it was repor­ted that glob­al tour­ist arrivals were 664 mil­lion. By 2019 arrivals had increased to 1.5 billion. 

Inter­na­tion­al vis­it­or arrivals more than doubled in 20 years. All the while, at con­fer­ences, sem­inars, and sum­mits, the industry, des­tin­a­tion man­agers, and gov­ern­ments con­tin­ued to talk about sus­tain­able tour­ism! Yet col­lect­ively they have done very little to make tour­ism the sus­tain­able activ­ity it should be; an activ­ity that bene­fits all involved, from tour­ists to loc­al com­munit­ies and industry players.

Now, because of COVID-19, tour­ism has come to a stand­still around the world, and many com­ment­at­ors across the inter­net have noted that we have the oppor­tun­ity to plan ahead for a more sus­tain­able future.

Unfor­tu­nately I think that this is only an illu­sion. Based on pro­jec­tions of con­tin­ued growth in vis­it­or arrivals, too much money has been inves­ted in tour­ism-related infra­struc­ture and devel­op­ments to allow glob­al tour­ism to be more strictly controlled.

Unless des­tin­a­tions reg­u­late tour­ism with­in their own jur­is­dic­tions, in a year’s time we will be back to over­tour­ism in Venice, Bar­celona, and Ams­ter­dam and we will be back to crowded attrac­tions, because, as the old say­ing wrongly states: Greed is Good.

What do you think? Share a short anec­dote or com­ment below. Or write a deep­er “GT” InsightThe “Good Tour­ism” Blog wel­comes diversity of opin­ion and per­spect­ive about travel & tour­ism because travel & tour­ism is everyone’s business.

Fea­tured image (top of post): Is tour­ism greed good or should tour­ism be by invit­a­tion only? Image sup­plied by author.

About the author

Dr Thomas Bauer. Image: Jeff Topham.
Dr Thomas Bauer. Image by Jeff Topham

Dr Thomas Bauer is Adjunct Pro­fess­or, School of Tour­ism and Hos­pit­al­ity at The Uni­ver­sity of the South Pacific, Fiji as well as a polar exped­i­tions guide for Albatros Exped­i­tions. Since 1989, Dr Bauer has been a lec­turer, admin­is­trat­or and research­er in the field of tour­ism, as well as a con­sult­ant on pro­jects for the United Nations World Tour­ism Organ­isa­tion (UNWTO) and the gov­ern­ments of China and Hong Kong SAR. He has also gen­er­ously giv­en of his free time: As a State Emer­gency Ser­vice (SES) volun­teer in Queens­land, Aus­tralia; and as an act­ive mem­ber of the Pacific Asia Travel Asso­ci­ation (PATA), includ­ing its Sus­tain­able Tour­ism Committee. 

Res­id­ents of Mis­sion Beach in Queens­land, Dr Bauer and his part­ner Lina are rain­forest guard­i­ans of the Aus­trali­an Rain­forest Found­a­tion.

Related posts

Follow comments on this post
Please notify me of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.